In an effort to aid efforts to help identify terrorists (suspected to be concealing their identities by using vehicles with tinted windows) the Inspector General of Kenya’s Police Service gave the directive to impound all vehicles with tinted windows in 2014 (Matata, 2014). In 2017, in response to abductions of women and children by culprits posing as taxi drivers, Prime Minister Holness of Jamaica instructed law enforcement officers to ensure that all public passenger vehicles (taxis) had their tinting removed (Nation News, 2017).
The component interventionHeader has not been created yet or is not available for this content page type.
The component headerBackButton has not been created yet or is not available for this content page type.
General Overview
Type of stakeholder
EICS Framework
Region of Reference
- Africa
- Asia
- Australia
- Europe
- North-America
- South-America
- World
Description
This intervention refers to the introduction of restrictions on the level of window tinting permitted on public transport and informal paratransit vehicles. The purpose of this restriction is to ensure that illicit activities onboard vehicles (including sexual harassment) are not concealed by dark-tinted windows [3].
The minimum recommended Visible Light Transmitted (VLT) for side windows is 70%, while front windshields should be free of tinting, and rear windshields should have a minimum VLT of 75% [3].
Facts/Illustrations/Case studies
Types of Impact
Area Impacted
- To/from the stop/station/rank✕
- Waiting for train/bus/paratransit✕
- In the vehicle✓
- At interchanges✕
Time of Day of Impact
- Day-time travel✓
- Night-time travel✓
- Peak-time travel✓
- Off peak-time travel✓
Mode Impacted
- Bus✓
- Train✓
- Rideshare✓
- 4 wheelers informal✓
- 3 wheelers informal✓
- 2 wheelers informal✕
- Cycling✕
- Walking✕
Demographic impacted
- Girls✓
- Boys✓
- Adult Women✓
- Men✓
- Elderly Women✓
- LGBTQI+✓
Resources
SWOT Analysis
Minimal cost to replace non-compliant film (not essential for the film to be reinstalled)
Requires minimal skills to remove and replace tinting film
Allows enforcement officers and the general public to be able to see more easily into vehicles
Window tinting and films do reduce heat gain in vehicles, and therefore in hot climates increased use of air-conditioning can result in decreased fuel efficiency (although there are films that still block UV rays and heat without blocking light)
Reduction in other criminal activities
Perpetrators can be eyewitnessed more easily, and victims rescued from the situation more easily
Some operators may not want to remove the non-compliant film
The legislation would need to be passed to enable enforcement
Effectiveness
Heavily tinted windows are problematic on public transport vehicles, especially in contexts where harassment and even abductions of women and children are prevalent since it is far less likely that passers-by will be able to see if occupants are in distress [3]. It is for this reason that some authorities have banned heavy tinting, or tinting films altogether [5].
- Perception by (female) passengers
- Perception by governing bodies
- Level of confidence in these ratings
Implementation
The benefits ensue immediately upon implementation, and so long as the requirements are enforced, the benefits are maintained.
Implementation timeframe
- 0-1 year✓
- 1-3 years✕
- >3 years✕
Timeframe to realise benefits
- 0-1 year✓
- 1-3 years✕
- >3 years✕
Scale of Implementation
This intervention can be implemented from city level up.
Suburb
Ease of Implementation
Removal (and replacement if desired) of tint film is a very simple task.
List of References
Africa
Asia
Europe
3. https://democracy.tunbridgewells.gov.uk/documents/s19446/Report.pdf
North America
5. https://www.nationnews.com/2017/02/18/editorial-respect-vehicle-tinted-glass-laws/