In Kampala, “In parliament there is an Infrastructure committee which is responsible for public transport issues, and it is dominated by men; it is not appealing for women to be part of the committee. We have quotas/target of 30%, however”.
The component interventionHeader has not been created yet or is not available for this content page type.
The component headerBackButton has not been created yet or is not available for this content page type.
General Overview
Type of stakeholder
EICS Framework
Region of Reference
- Africa
- Asia
- Australia
- Europe
- North-America
- South-America
- World
Description
The built environment plays an important role in affecting perceptions of safety when it comes to sexual harassment and assault, as well as affecting the number of incidents that occur. Safer spaces and more equal access to urban design can be ensured with women’s participation in the decision-making process, which can help promote gender-sensitive territorial planning and therefore social inclusion.
This intervention may be used to learn about women’s experiences within public spaces and incorporate (female) public participation in planning strategies, as well as increase the feeling of safety of all users in the urban environment.
Facts/Illustrations/Case studies
Types of Impact
Area Impacted
- To/from the stop/station/rank✓
- Waiting for train/bus/paratransit✓
- In the vehicle✕
- At interchanges✓
Time of Day of Impact
- Day-time travel✓
- Night-time travel✓
- Peak-time travel✓
- Off peak-time travel✓
Mode Impacted
- Bus✓
- Train✓
- Rideshare✓
- 4 wheelers informal✓
- 3 wheelers informal✓
- 2 wheelers informal✓
- Cycling✓
- Walking✓
Demographic impacted
- Girls✓
- Boys✓
- Adult Women✓
- Men✓
- Elderly Women✓
- LGBTQI+✓
Resources
SWOT Analysis
Only limited skills required
Scalable to suit budget and need for the resource
Improves female representation in the transport system from the top down
Does not guarantee that issues will be addressed in transport policy and change will occur
Target women preferences regarding safe and secure travel
Might not be as effective as envisioned. Depends on women's awareness and ability to argue the topic
If this is done just as a "rubber stamp" exercise, no impact will be made, needs buy-in from current decision-makers and genuine integration of the female perspective
Effectiveness
Literature shows that females have an increased fear of crime. Since this intervention includes the views of females early in the decision-making process, it should be perceived positively by female passengers, as well as governing bodies who want to keep their public transport system safe. As there is a small amount literature to support this, confidence in these ratings is low.
- Perception by (female) passengers
- Perception by governing bodies
- Level of confidence in these ratings
Implementation
Implementation timeframe
- 0-1 year✓
- 1-3 years✕
- >3 years✕
Timeframe to realise benefits
- 0-1 year✓
- 1-3 years✓
- >3 years✓
Scale of Implementation
Suburb
Ease of Implementation
This intervention is very easy to implement.
List of References
Africa
1. Muhoza, C., Wikman, A., & Chavez, R. D. (2021). Mainstreaming gender in urban public transport. Sweden: Stockholm Environment Institute.
South America
2. Falú, A. (2017, June 7). Women's Right to the City: Reflections on Inclusive Urban Planning.
World
3. Listerborn, C. (2015). Feminist struggle over urban safety and the politics of space. European Journal of Women's Studies.